The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) recently garnered attention by releasing Halima Shehu, the suspended National Coordinator and Chief Executive Officer of the National Social Investment Programme Agency (NSIPA), after an extensive questioning session.
The investigation revolved around the staggering sum of N37,170,855,753.44 allegedly laundered by the Ministry of Humanitarian Affairs, Disaster Management, and Social Development, formerly headed by Sadiya Umar-Farouk.
EFCC’s spokesperson, Dele Oyewale, confirmed this development to this reporter on Thursday, stressing the agency’s directive for Mrs Shehu’s availability whenever required.
“We have never detained her. She has been coming and going,” Mr Oyewale stated, contrasting reports suggesting her detainment after EFCC officials raided NSIPA’s office in the Federal Secretariat, FCT, and transferred her to the EFCC headquarters in Jabi, Abuja.
Mrs Shehu, responsible for overseeing the Conditional Cash Transfer Programme during President Buhari’s tenure, underwent scrutiny regarding fund movements from the ministry’s accounts. Reports link her involvement with the N37.1 billion case during her tenure as the National Coordinator of the programme.
President Bola Tinubu’s suspension of Mrs. Shehu from her roles as CEO and National Coordinator of NSIPA marked a significant step pending the investigation’s conclusion. In the interim, Mr. Akindele Egbuwalo has been appointed in an acting capacity.
Meanwhile, the EFCC summoned Mrs Umar-Farouk for questioning concerning the same alleged money laundering case that transpired during her tenure, involving the substantial sum.
The unfolding events underscore the EFCC’s continual efforts to uphold transparency and accountability within public offices.
However, the contradictory information about Mrs Shehu’s status, being both free and reportedly detained, presents a notable discrepancy requiring further clarification.
This saga raises critical inquiries into governmental fund management and amplifies the necessity for robust oversight mechanisms to prevent financial misappropriation.
Amidst ongoing investigations, this high-profile case accentuates the indispensable role of accountability in governance and underscores the urgency for stringent measures to safeguard public funds.
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional
Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Pingback: Legal expert questions EFCC's handling of Bello case: raises key legal issues - Asiwaju Media